360 Degree Feedback Report

360 Degree Feedback report for
JOHN SMITH
08/10/2008 09:08:42

What follows is a summary analysis of the feedback that has been provided by individuals who completed the questionnaire for you.

You will find below:
- A summary of the scores, by activity and by contributory group.
- Graphical representations comparing contributory group scores for each activity.
- The qualitative information provided by the contributors. - Please note, this information is confidential.

Developmental Review for JOHN SMITH employee no.123 review no. 124
based on a total rating score of 99 taken from 35 questions
overall average = 2.8
(self score & `Unable to rate` not included)

This text is replaced by the summary chart.


Ratings	Groups	Responses
0 - Unable to rate 1 - Little or no competence 2 - Some competence, but below level required for role 3 - Competence at required level for role 4 - Competence exceeds level required for role	S - Self M - Manager All - All (except self) P - Peers TM - Team members O - Others	1 1 2 1 1 1

(1) Reliability/Credibility

This text is replaced by the chart.

(2) Leadership

This text is replaced by the chart.

(3) Communication

This text is replaced by the chart.

Ratings	Groups
0 - Unable to rate 1 - Little or no competence 2 - Some competence, but below level required for role 3 - Competence at required level for role 4 - Competence exceeds level required for role	S - Self M - Manager All - All (except self) P - Peers TM - Team members O - Others

Self, Line manager and All line graph

Reliability/Credibility - sub level1a

JOHN SMITH replies to messages in a timely manner.

This text is replaced by the question score chart.	0 - Unable to rate 1 - Little or no competence 2 - Some competence, but below level required for role 3 - Competence at required level for role 4 - Competence exceeds level required for role	S = Self M = Manager All = All except self P = Peer TM = Team member O = Other
(Question comments, Self & Manager group names shown, other group names not shown & displayed at random)
Self - does ok Manager - priorities are sometimes not dealt with urgency Anonymous - he is a good employee Anonymous - I always find him very reliable

Reliability/Credibility - sub level1a

JOHN SMITH keeps team members adequately informed.

This text is replaced by the question score chart.

0 - Unable to rate
1 - Little or no competence
2 - Some competence, but below level required for role
3 - Competence at required level for role
4 - Competence exceeds level required for role

S = Self
M = Manager
All = All except self
P = Peer
TM = Team member
O = Other

Reliability/Credibility - sub level1a

JOHN SMITH demonstrates consistency between action and words.

This text is replaced by the question score chart.	0 - Unable to rate 1 - Little or no competence 2 - Some competence, but below level required for role 3 - Competence at required level for role 4 - Competence exceeds level required for role	S = Self M = Manager All = All except self P = Peer TM = Team member O = Other
(Question comments, Self & Manager group names shown, other group names not shown & displayed at random)
Anonymous - he delivers what he promises

Leadership - sub level 1b

JOHN SMITH provides guidance and clear direction when required.

This text is replaced by the question score chart.

0 - Unable to rate
1 - Little or no competence
2 - Some competence, but below level required for role
3 - Competence at required level for role
4 - Competence exceeds level required for role

S = Self
M = Manager
All = All except self
P = Peer
TM = Team member
O = Other

Leadership - sub level 1b

JOHN SMITH provides information required for team members to do excellent work.

This text is replaced by the question score chart.	0 - Unable to rate 1 - Little or no competence 2 - Some competence, but below level required for role 3 - Competence at required level for role 4 - Competence exceeds level required for role	S = Self M = Manager All = All except self P = Peer TM = Team member O = Other
(Question comments, Self & Manager group names shown, other group names not shown & displayed at random)
Self - I think this is my strongest point Anonymous - unable to rate

Leadership - sub level 1c

JOHN SMITH implements plans to achieve the department/company`s goals.

This text is replaced by the question score chart.

0 - Unable to rate
1 - Little or no competence
2 - Some competence, but below level required for role
3 - Competence at required level for role
4 - Competence exceeds level required for role

S = Self
M = Manager
All = All except self
P = Peer
TM = Team member
O = Other

Communication - sub level 1c

JOHN SMITH communicates the vision of the company to team members.

This text is replaced by the question score chart.	0 - Unable to rate 1 - Little or no competence 2 - Some competence, but below level required for role 3 - Competence at required level for role 4 - Competence exceeds level required for role	S = Self M = Manager All = All except self P = Peer TM = Team member O = Other
(Question comments, Self & Manager group names shown, other group names not shown & displayed at random)
Anonymous - excellent communicator

Communication - sub level 1c

JOHN SMITH communicates the goals of the department to team members

This text is replaced by the question score chart.

0 - Unable to rate
1 - Little or no competence
2 - Some competence, but below level required for role
3 - Competence at required level for role
4 - Competence exceeds level required for role

S = Self
M = Manager
All = All except self
P = Peer
TM = Team member
O = Other

Communication - sub level 2a

JOHN SMITH communicates the business strategy of the department to team members

This text is replaced by the question score chart.

0 - Unable to rate
1 - Little or no competence
2 - Some competence, but below level required for role
3 - Competence at required level for role
4 - Competence exceeds level required for role

S = Self
M = Manager
All = All except self
P = Peer
TM = Team member
O = Other

All review end notes: (Self & Manager group names shown, other group names not shown & displayed at random)

Self - I know I require further training to do a better job

Manager - overall a very good employee

Anonymous - lacks focus sometimes

Anonymous - I enjoy working for John